SAML2StringNameID format

[Cantor, Scott]

On 6/9/14, 8:10 PM, "UA" <dabantz at alaska.edu> wrote:

>I'm working also to integrate ArcGIS; the attribute resolver def they
>provide in online documentation (which you quoted) seems to be set to
>release whatever is flagged as the principal in the resolver; at least
>for our case that depends on how the user
> authenticates and is determined by the IdP; that is, not assured to be
>the same value each time for a given user.  It has seemed to me necessary
>to define a new attribute for this service that is stable and represents
>the user to this service, but uses the
> encoder requested.

Yes, I noticed that; somebody might want to tell them to stop giving
people that kind of documentation, and stick to defining their
requirements and not methodologies.

-- Scott