shibd massive memory growth and CPU usage

[Cantor, Scott]

On 7/10/14, 11:23 PM, "Stockley, Jonathan" <jonathan.stockley at emc.com>
wrote:

>We are definitely not using prefork:

Then I don't know how you'd ever get to 100s of threads in shibd, I've
never seen it climb much above 30 or so under load.

>Is there any debugging I can turn on to get more info?

No.

>Looking at the transaction log file I see that the NameIdentifier is
>always the same. I'll try turning off maintainReverseIndex and see if
>that helps.

You'll never get a load test to work otherwise.

-- Scott