IDP node stickiness without an SLB?
Wessel, Keith
kwessel at illinois.edu
Thu Jan 23 10:19:35 EST 2014
Interesting, Jim. Could you give a few more details on this to help us avoid this if our situation turns out to be similar? We're running in a VMWard environment and can easily throw more processors/memory at the system as well as bump up Apache max clients and Tomcat max threads.
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at shibboleth.net [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net] On Behalf Of Jim Fox
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:25 PM
To: Shib Users
Subject: Re: IDP node stickiness without an SLB?
Our experience was that active/passive didn't scale very well.
Jim
On Jan 22, 2014, at 4:04 PM, "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2 at osu.edu>
wrote:
> On 1/22/14, 5:51 PM, "Wessel, Keith" <kwessel at illinois.edu> wrote:
>
>> But all of this sure is making active/passive tempting.
>
> My next upgrade will be, no question about it.
>
> -- Scott
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
More information about the users
mailing list