Auto Configuration Reloading Test Case for IDP

Peter Schober peter.schober at univie.ac.at
Thu Jan 23 03:54:37 EST 2014


* Joshua Riffle <jriffle at apu.edu> [2014-01-23 01:34]:
> Picture didn't seem to show for the Service Provider example so here it is

Your complete post didn't seem to have made it to the list (I have not
yet looked at any attached pictures, not knowing what for).

> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Joshua Riffle <jriffle at apu.edu> wrote:
> > So I have been testing scenarios for applying configuration
> > changes to an Identity Provider using the automatic configuration
> > reloading (in service.xml) on relying-party.xml specifically. In
> > my use-case I tried momentarily commenting out a vanilla
> > Shibboleth Service Provider that I use for testing.

For that specific issue I'd create an entry in the project's bug
tracker. But note that that is not a recommended configuration
strategy and as workarounds exist it might not be treated with high
priority.

The recommended way to dynamically add, change or remove metadata
without restarting the container (or context) is via auto-reloading
metadata providers. There's no need to and you should not add a new
RelyingParty to relying-party.xml for each and every SP.

So maybe this is a classic case of "It hurts when I do this".
-peter


More information about the users mailing list