example of <DiscoveryFilter>
Tom Scavo
trscavo at gmail.com
Tue Feb 11 16:19:24 EST 2014
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
>
> <DiscoveryFilter matcher="EntityAttributes" type="Whitelist">
> <saml:Attribute xmlns:saml="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion"
> NameFormat="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:attrname-format:uri"
> Name="http://macedir.org/entity-category">
>
> <saml:AttributeValue>http://id.incommon.org/category/research-and-scholarsh
> ip</saml:AttributeValue>
> </saml:Attribute>
> </DiscoveryFilter>
That's helpful, thanks. If I wanted to whitelist additional entities
(in addition to those above), I would just add one or more
<RelyingParty> elements. I assume order doesn't matter, that is, any
number of <saml:Attribute> elements and <RelyingParty> elements could
be added to the whitelist in any order, correct?
> Discovery filters aren't open-ended like the metadata filters, there's
> just a fixed pair of types, Whitelist and Blacklist.
So you could have two <DiscoveryFilter> elements back-to-back, one a
whitelist and the other a blacklist. In that case, I would think order
*would* matter, right?
Sorry if these questions are answered in some schema somewhere.
Thanks,
Tom
More information about the users
mailing list