Empty Conditions Element w/out NotBefore or NotOnOrAfter attributes

[Cantor, Scott]

On 12/9/14, 1:35 PM, "Walden H. Leverich" <WaldenL at TechSoftInc.com> wrote:



>So here’s the question… Who’s wrong in this case? The OASIS schema seems 
>to imply that neither the NotBefore nor the NotOnOrAfter attributes are 
>actually required. But I know the schema doesn’t always tell the whole 
>story. Additionally, it makes sense that if there are no subelements then 
>the only reason for including the conditions element would be to indicate 
>a date range.

Honestly, I'd have to go read. I don't recall if I had a textual 
justification for that validator rule or not.

> 
>Finally, and I don’t see how looking at the source, but is there a 
>flag/setting we can enable to tell the validation to be more permissive?

No.

-- Scott