Shibboleth IdP v3 beta 1 Salesforce.com Integration
Cantor, Scott
cantor.2 at osu.edu
Sat Dec 6 16:03:05 EST 2014
On 12/6/14, 12:13 AM, "Mark Boyce" <Mark.Boyce at ucop.edu> wrote:
>We were successful using an attribute, but only without encryption.
>Adding encryption forced us to revert to using a nameID / Subject rather
>than attribute. Salesforce supposedly supports both. Seems the choice
>is attribute without encryption or encryption and send nameID/Subject.
That may have been the bug we hit. I didn't ever think to try that,
because, uh, that makes no sense. ;-)
I also abandoned encryption with them because I had the strong impression
they botched it and we're doing to basically roll their decryption key
every year, since they used a certificate with an expiration in it. Not
worth the hassle IMHO.
-- Scott
More information about the users
mailing list