Shibboleth IdP v3 beta 1 Salesforce.com Integration

[Mark Boyce]

Gary,

We were successful using an attribute, but only without encryption.  Adding encryption forced us to revert to using a nameID / Subject rather than attribute.  Salesforce supposedly supports both.  Seems the choice is attribute without encryption or encryption and send nameID/Subject.

Mark 

-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at shibboleth.net [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net] On Behalf Of Cantor, Scott
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 3:10 PM
To: Shib Users
Subject: Re: Shibboleth IdP v3 beta 1 Salesforce.com Integration

On 12/5/14, 10:09 PM, "Gary Gwin" <ggwin at cafesoft.com> wrote:
>
>They suggest they do so I had tried that alternative before posting and 
>couldn't get it to work. I found posts that suggest including the 
>username in the Subject might be required by Salesforce:
>
>https://success.salesforce.com/answers?id=90630000000gpzrAAA

Well, I checked my config, and FWIW, I'm using an EPPN Attribute. So at least the version we're on here, it worked.

-- Scott

--
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net