Shibboleth session vs Application session
Sathish Anickode
SAnickode at skytouchtechnology.com
Fri Dec 5 13:51:03 EST 2014
The documentation states the following (https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/display/SHIB2/IdPUserAuthn). It does mention that the statement is confusing. Does that indicate that the inactivity timeout is not supported?
Session Lifetime
The session lifetime is configured in the IDP_HOME/conf/internal.xml file. Locate the shibboleth.SessionManager bean. Its second constructor argument is the inactivity timeout, in milliseconds, for the session. By default it is 30 minutes.
Admittedly, this is a totally confusing and poorly represented setting. It will be changed in a future release.
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at shibboleth.net [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net] On Behalf Of Cantor, Scott
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 10:59 AM
To: Shib Users
Subject: Re: Shibboleth session vs Application session
On 12/5/14, 4:24 PM, "Sathish Anickode" <SAnickode at skytouchtechnology.com>
wrote:
>
>Based on the PCI requirements, I think it is fine if the IdP cookie has a
>life time of 8 hrs as long as the inactivity timeout is set to 15
>minutes. We would also configure the application sessions to timeout
>after 15 minutes of inactivity.
There is no inactivity timeout in the IdP. There is only authentication
method duration/lifetime applying individually to each login handler's
authentication result. It is a lifetime, not a timeout.
>In this scenario, if the user accesses a different application that uses
>the same SSO after 15 minutes, they will be forced to re-authenticate, as
>the IdP cookie would have expired due to inactivity. Is there a way to
>keep the IdP cookie from timing out due to inactivity while an
>application session is active?
There is no such timeout.
-- Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
More information about the users
mailing list