TestShib.org signature algorithm changed?

[Cantor, Scott]

On 4/2/14, 1:27 PM, "Adam Conley" <aconley at ratex.com> wrote:

>Was the switch to SHA256 intentional, or is there any chance it will
>switch back to SHA1 to support older implementations, like ours?

No, there's no chance. For one thing, the point of the change was to flush
out and assist with identifying broken systems, and secondly, we would
never do it to accomodate a non-Shibboleth software issue since testshib's
purpose is to help people evaluate Shibboleth, nothing more.

-- Scott