Metadata Issue
Thomas Jones
thomas.jones.g at gmail.com
Thu Oct 31 17:13:33 EDT 2013
Thanks Peter!
Any other idea regarding the other questions?
Thanks!
Best,
Thomas
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Peter Schober
<peter.schober at univie.ac.at>wrote:
> * Thomas Jones <thomas.jones.g at gmail.com> [2013-10-31 16:32]:
> > Peter I don't understand:
> >
> > > Note that for locally managed metadata there's no gain in having
> > > any validUntil on the EntityDescriptor. So leaving that out is one
> > > possibility.
> >
> > Since you mention that validUntil is useless in this context, how can I
> > make a local managed metadata expired?
>
> I meant maintaining a validUntil XML attribute (value) on the
> EntityDescriptor for a static, unsigned, local file (if that is in
> fact what you'd doing), doesn't add anything useful. So I suggested to
> remove the validUntil attribute from the local file. Then it simply
> cannot expire. It's local to your IdP, so you have other ways of
> dealing with that entity.
>
> > > The other one is setting requireValidMetadata="false" on the IdP's
> > > MetadataProvider for that custom relying party, but I see you
> > > already have that (so either way an expired EntityDescriptor from
> > > a local file shouldn't disrupt operations).
> > > -peter
> >
> > is not that what is happening? (the operation it's been
> > disrupted). Due the fact that the EntityDescriptor is not valid (I'm
> > assuming that the reason is because it has expired) is showing that
> > it's treating the relyingParty as anonymous, right?
>
> What I meant to say (maybe I didn't, English is not my native
> language): The fact that you already had requireValidMetadata="false"
> on the metadata provider for that local file should rule out expired
> entities based on the value of validUntil. So watever is or isn't in
> validUntil (or whether there is such an attribute in the XML at all)
> should /not/ cause the entity to expire (i.e, should not disrupt
> operations by treating the entity as an anonymous RP).
> Now you're saying it did disrupt operations, so I don't have an
> explanation for that other than that it's either a bug and/or it
> cannot have anything to do with validUntil.
> -peter
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20131031/678479a9/attachment.html
More information about the users
mailing list