SAML2 attribute names breaking standards

[Cantor, Scott]

On 11/22/13, 12:05 PM, "Wessel, Keith" <kwessel at illinois.edu> wrote:

>Thanks, Scott and Nate, for confirming my suspicions on this.
>
>I've told the vendor no and asked them to change their approach, at least
>paying attention to the friendly name if nothing else. I'm not holding my
>breath, but we'll see what comes of it.

I would not advocate that you get them looking at FriendlyName, that has a
purely debugging non-normative function in SAML.

Of the options, using a custom Name is better than that one.

-- Scott