IDP reports: Message was expired but times look valid
paul.hethmon at clareitysecurity.com
Thu Nov 14 13:17:28 EST 2013
Hmm, if it's 5 PM in Chicago (17:00), then it's 11:00 PM in London
(23:00), not 11:00 AM. Right?
On 11/14/13 12:07 PM, "Douglas E. Engert" <deengert at anl.gov> wrote:
>On 11/14/2013 10:57 AM, Paul Hethmon wrote:
>>If I'm doing my time math correctly, your local time converted to UTC is
>>22:59:28 (local time + 6 hours yields UTC). The UTC timestamp is
>>so well past expiration.
>This is an intermittent problem...
>2013-11-13T16:59:28.235-06:00 (Chicago) The Vendor is in the Mountain TZ
>I think the math is -6 hours, 2013-11-13T10:59:28.235Z 2 seconds after
>the assertion was created.
More information about the users