"SAML 2.0 Compliant"?

[Tom Scavo]

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Marc Boorshtein <mboorshtein at gmail.com> wrote:
> Along the same lines, I tend to focus more on which profiles are supported,
> which identifiers, etc.  Most every vendor "supports" SAML2 but they might
> require specific authentication mechanisms (ADFS) or have limitations such
> as only able to supply a user identifier in the assertion but not other
> attributes.

As Scott mentioned earlier, the ability to handle SAML metadata is a
crucial differentiator. For example, ask your partner how they handle
key rollover (https://spaces.internet2.edu/x/vgEFAQ) to see how much
hand holding is required.

Tom