"SAML 2.0 Compliant"?

[Tom Scavo]

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:26 PM, MikeWho <who at me.com> wrote:
>
> (The funny thing about SAML integrations in my (limited!) experience, is how
> the real-world process matches the digital one, with both sides feeling each
> other out for their capabilities. "Do you know more about SAML than us, or
> do we need to walk you through it? etc.)

Good observation. Of course that doesn't scale so we need to find
other ways to learn about our partners. Multi-lateral federations can
help in this regard, but I agree with you, nothing's better than good
ol' bilateral federation ;-)

Tom