"SAML 2.0 Compliant"?

[MikeWho]

Thanks all for your advice!

I guess the answer then is D) That's a bad question. There are better, more
specific questions that you could ask that would reveal more about our
interoperability. ;)

FWIW, they use the Tivoli IdP, and we already have integrated with it for
SSO & user provisioning. Now however we integrate with another service to
pull additional data from their network, which is where this question came
up. 

The saml2int profile is interesting, we're not strictly compliant with it as
signed requests were a client requirement. 

(The funny thing about SAML integrations in my (limited!) experience, is how
the real-world process matches the digital one, with both sides feeling each
other out for their capabilities. "Do you know more about SAML than us, or
do we need to walk you through it? etc.)

Thanks all again!
Mike.



--
View this message in context: http://shibboleth.1660669.n2.nabble.com/SAML-2-0-Compliant-tp7587053p7587058.html
Sent from the Shibboleth - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.