breaking conf files down into smaller chunks

Liam Hoekenga liamr at
Fri May 3 14:16:34 EDT 2013

On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at> wrote:
>> I tried it.  The log message was not promising..
> No, looks like he did the schema with actual ref constraints on the IDs. So no, they have to be internally consistent.

In this case, the dependency is a DataConnector definition.  If I put
a copy of the definition in the file, it stops complaining.

That would seem to suggest that every resolver file has to have
definitions for the data connectors that it uses?  Which is kind of
annoying, in that I'd potentially have to have multiple copies of the
same connector (I'd want to break the files resolver files by use..
but almost all of our attribute data is based on our central LDAP

It did not complain about having attribute dependencies from other
resolver files.  I haven't tested to see if those attributes produce
the desired data, but it didn't complain when the IdP was loading.


More information about the users mailing list