"LoginContext key cookie was not present in request" with particular SP

[Tom Scavo]

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
> On 6/28/13 12:02 PM, "Ian Rifkin" <irifkin at brandeis.edu> wrote:
>>
>>Unfortunately I'm now on to this vendor's next problem, of course. My
>>logs tells me that "SAML message intended destination endpoint URI
>>required by binding was empty" which seems pretty straight forward, but
>>in a previous message from the SP vendor they
>> linked me to a wikipedia section on the SAML2 auth request protocol
>><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAML_2.0#Authentication_Request_Protocol>,
>>which now looking at it, doesn't have a destination attribute. Am I
>>reading this wrong?
>
> Wikipedia is not the standard, and it is deeply disturbing that anybody
> would treat it as such.

That said, I wrote that wikipedia entry, and if it's wrong, I will fix it.

> The entry is wrong.

Can you tell me what's wrong with it? AFAIK, the Destination XML
attribute is required only if the protocol message is signed.

Tom