how to reference an existing attribute in resolver.xml

[Nate Klingenstein]

That would make it impossible to select one encoding versus another encoding by SP by using the attribute filter engine.  With two encoders for one protocol, I dunno what would happen -- whether you'd get both encodings(and two copies of the attribute) in every assertion, or whether one would take precedence, or what.

On Jun 27, 2013, at 19:02 , David Bantz wrote:

> Can that not be done within a single attribute definition - that is, two encoders in the same attribute definition?
> That seems to make what's being done a little more transparent, but is there a reason to avoid doing so?
> 
> David Bantz
>