PrincipalName as NameID?

[Byte Flinger]

Hi

Since this is a simple test, I dont care about the transientId attribute in
attribute-resolver.xml (For now, just until I get things working).
Also what I want is want whatever the PrincipalName attributeDefinition
type returns, as my NameID.
I guess I missunderstood the whole transient and persistentID.

I don't think my SP is request any specific NameID though I will confirm
that.

If I understand correctly from the documentation, nameID definitions on the
SP or IDP metadata are just for info and don't really make a difference is
that correct?

So basically what you guys are saying is that other than the use of
unspecified instead of transient or persistent, what I am doing is correct?

Lastly, if one should not use unspecified then how does one get an
unspecified NameID like in the google example from the wiki, or is that
example just plain wrong?




On 25 June 2013 18:08, Peter Schober <peter.schober at univie.ac.at> wrote:

> * <peter.schober at univie.ac.at> [2013-06-25 18:06]:
> > Hi "byte filger",
> [...]>
> > The over way round, right?
>
> Please ignore my many typoes today...
> -peter
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20130625/1085a841/attachment.html