Shibboleth SP - Using NameID with "unspecified" format.
Cantor, Scott
cantor.2 at osu.edu
Mon Jul 22 09:29:21 EDT 2013
On 7/22/13 6:44 AM, "Friedrich Clausen" <fred at derf.nl> wrote:
>It appears, due to the "samlp" message, that the AD FS "IdP" is using
>SAML 1.1.
No, ADFS doesn't support SAML 1.1.
>This solves my problem (getting the user name visible to the app). My
>question is - is this a recommended approach? Should I, or the AD FS
>administrators, do something differently?
Unspecified is always incorrect to use if you want to be interoperable.
-- Scott
More information about the users
mailing list