compiling shibsp 2.5.1 on solaris: breakdown at the last few steps

[Uwe Reh]

Am 15.02.2013 17:13, schrieb Christopher Bongaarts:
> I don't have an answer for you, but if you add -C to your nm command,
> you can get more sensible looking results...
Thanks

OK, with the formated output is the difference more obvious.
libshibsp.so:
> bool xmltooling::AbstractPKIXTrustEngine::validate(x509_st*,stack_st*,const xmltooling::CredentialResolver&,xmltooling::CredentialCriteria*)const
libxmltooling.so:
> bool xmltooling::ExplicitKeyTrustEngine::validate(x509_st*,stack_st_X509*,const xmltooling::CredentialResolver&,xmltooling::CredentialCriteria*)const

But why is the signature of the method different between the reference 
in libshibsp.so and the implementation in libxmltooling.so?
Do I miss a library where this method is overwritten?

BTW. should 'stack_st*' and 'stack_st_X509*' be compatible?

?????
Uwe