Anyonymous relying parties
Sean McHugh
sean8sean at gmail.com
Wed Dec 11 23:00:31 EST 2013
I've recently discovered the joy of Anonymous relying parties as my Shib
IdP infrastructure has now grown.
While I find it convenient to utilize this as a way to reduce overhead in
managing SPs, I've grown more concerned about the potential for abuse:
in theory, one could coax a user to a URL configured to send a proper
AuthNRequest to my IdP, thereby capturing attributes released by default
Am I correct here? Is there documentation or a collection of thoughts on
other potential security concerns surrounding Anon RPs?
So, while I could potentially limit the default released attributes to
almost nothing, that would erode the benefit i've seen from utilizing
Anonymous RPs;
I'm wondering, has anyone proposed, or does there exist an implementation
of a whitelist functionality to only enable sending an AuthNResponse to a
set of
approved Issuers? Perhaps sometime of wildcard functionality, etc.
I realize that the answer is probably: get the metadata for the SP and
configure it in relying-party.xml and disable Anonymous RPs ...
however, the administrative overhead involved in this is a burden for
smaller shops.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20131211/2232e7e5/attachment.html
More information about the users
mailing list