Handling 'dynamic' parameter in ACS url

[Cantor, Scott]

On 4/16/13 3:22 PM, "Maharaj, Sudhir" <smaharaj at bu.edu> wrote:

>While it appears the vendor implementation might not be according to
>SAML2 spec, how best do you think to proceed to implement this
>integration? Is there a way to 'wildcard' (for lack of a better term)
>ACS or something similar? Anyone else have similar issue integrating with
>vendor SAML2 implementations?

There isn't (and yes, it's basically not an appropriate thing to do), but
2.4 will include an option to bypass endpoint checks if the request
message is signed. That would be a possible work-around for you.

The 2.4 release is likely to happen tomorrow.

-- Scott