Supported SAML versions

[Cantor, Scott]

On 4/9/13 10:24 PM, "lalithj" <j_lalith at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>We got two SPs (including OIF) aksing the same question? That is , our
>IdP's
>(Shibboleth) support on SAML 1.1
>
>But we are insisting SAML 2.0 because all our prod SPs are SAML 2.0
>
>I just wanted to be clear on exact supported protocols

I misread the page I gave you a link to, I thought it said 1.1 when it
actually says 1.x. It's 1.1 with very little, accidental and not really
practical, support for 1.0.

-- Scott