On 4/9/13 9:47 PM, "lalithj" <j_lalith at hotmail.com> wrote: >Thanks Scott, > >I had a look at the handler.xml as well, there is no reference to SAML 1.1 >but to SAML 1.0 There are no references to SAML 1.0. If you think there are, read the standard and you'll see why they aren't. -- Scott