RelyingParty communication profiles

[Tompkins,Charles R]

On 04/08/2013 05:09 PM, Peter Schober wrote:
> * Tompkins,Charles R <crt at ufl.edu> [2013-04-08 22:47]:
>> Are the communication profiles configured in the Default Relying Party
>> completely seperate from profiles configured in a subsequent, specified
>> relying party in terms of any interaction/conflict/precedence of comm
>> profile?  As I read it, they appear to be independent of each other the
>> moment I define a specific relying party, but I wanted to be sure.
>
> I would think so.
>
>> For example, will specified relying parties be able to use
>> communication profiles defined in the default relying party that
>> aren't defined in it's own stanza?
>
> No. If e.g. there's no
> <rp:ProfileConfiguration xsi:type="saml:ShibbolethSSOProfile">
> defined for a specific relying party that RP should not be able to
> comminicate via that profile.
> Having the <rp:ProfileConfiguration> for a specific type defined the
> rest of the attributes on that element (assertionLifetime etc.) are
> defaulted, though.
> -peter
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
>


Thanks Guys!

-- 
Charles R. Tompkins
UF Information Technology
CNS/Open Systems Group