ADP integration
Mark K. Miller
max at psu.edu
Mon Nov 12 11:11:05 EST 2012
It may look like I'm "picking on" Steven here; I'm already sure he knows
I'm not. It's just an irresistible soapbox that I have to jump on for a
moment!
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Steven Carmody wrote:
> On 11/12/12 9:03 AM, Michael R. Gettes wrote:
>> We tried to use ADP. They want $5K for initial setup. You pay by
>> the user each month for federated access.
>
> I don't remember that being the case for Brown. When we started doing
> this there were already several schools that were not IC members that
> were already using SAML with ADP.
Just because previous InCommon members were not able to correctly lead a
vendor down "the InCommon path" is not justification for also ignoring the
right thing to do.
>> They refused to join
>> InCommon.
>
> that was also our experience. we couldn't get them to join.
What did you try? You'd be amazed what a vendor will do when you refuse
to do business with them.
> In addition.. ahhhh, how to say this in a non-pejorative fashion --
> there seemed to be a lot of staff turnover on their side. As a result,
> it took considerable effort on our part to find THE person at ADP with
> SAML clue.
Well, we certainly can't hold that against them! Even without staff
turnover, I've heard similar complaints within my institution. ;-)
Even if they have no person with a SAML clue, our community should be
ready to help develop that cluefullness with a business partner. If I can
do it, anyone can do it! (Ok, so what if they're still clueless even
after I 'help' them!)
> Note that following our move to Workday we no longer use ADP.
Note that ADP just happens to be the example in this discussion; there are
a ton of vendors that can be substituted with no different wording.
>> Their legal agreement took significant work on the part of
>> CMU to help them understand liability as they wanted to use federated
>> access as a reason to push ALL liability for their service onto us -
>> yes, this is true. We believe we got them to understand where
>> liability sits in a federated world but we are unsure if they learned
>> this lesson just for CMU or more broadly. In the end, after 1 year
>> of trying to make it work with them we decided to skip the continued
>> level of effort given our impending move to WorkDay. IMHO, for an
>> org as small as UCAID, I wouldn't recommend the cost (money as well
>> as effort).
And, there you go; Gettes took their business elsewhere. Good for you!
It only works if we all do it. Thanks,
Max
More information about the users
mailing list