Missing attribute from SAML2 response

[David Bantz]

Oops - thanks Scott.

On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, at 09:06 , "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:

> On 11/7/12 12:00 PM, "David Bantz" <dabantz at alaska.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Prior to the block of encrypted data in the logs should be something like
>> 'SAML assertion to be encrypted:' with the clear-text SAML assertion.
> 
> On the IdP, yes, but he's on the other end. The SP logs provide enough
> evidence of whether an attribute is included without needing the IdP log
> or the decrypted assertion (though all recent/supported versions do log
> the decrypted assertion).
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net