Attribute resolver dependency question/issue

[Christopher Bongaarts]

The more complicated branch/merge/multiplex cases for attributes.

On 5/4/2012 11:16 AM, Chad La Joie wrote:
> Come to mind for what?
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Christopher Bongaarts<cab at umn.edu>  wrote:
>> On 5/3/2012 1:59 PM, Chad La Joie wrote:
>>
>>> By having everything "scoped" to the plugin that produces the data you
>>> can create some fairly sophisticated data processing pipelines in the
>>> resolver.  One that merge and branch and multiplex data.  Most people
>>> just want merging behavior which is why all the fixed logic plugins
>>> (i.e., not the script ones) that we ship have that behavior.
>>
>> Any interesting use cases that come to mind for that?  Seems like it
>> might be a handy capability to use for some situations.
>> --
>> %%  Christopher A. Bongaarts   %%  cab at umn.edu          %%
>> %%  OIT - Identity Management  %%  http://umn.edu/~cab  %%
>> %%  University of Minnesota    %%  +1 (612) 625-1809    %%
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
>
>
>


-- 
%%  Christopher A. Bongaarts   %%  cab at umn.edu          %%
%%  OIT - Identity Management  %%  http://umn.edu/~cab  %%
%%  University of Minnesota    %%  +1 (612) 625-1809    %%