Shibboleth SP getting progressively slower

[Martin Haase]

Hi Scott,

has there been any progress on this matter, i.e. some fix? Or is there
anything one could configure at the SP side to prevent this?

Cheers,
Martin

Am 20.01.2012 19:20, schrieb Cantor, Scott:
> On 1/20/12 1:10 PM, "Steve Thorpe" <thorpe at mailbox.mcnc.org> wrote:
>> Out of curiosity, what is the default duration after which the reverse
>> index would expire?
> It expires when the cache entry for the session does. Or in this case when
> the last entry containing the affected NameID expires. The specific rules
> on that are very complicated because of the mix of deprecated and current
> options controlling cache timeouts. With newer defaults it's designed to
> be essentially at the same time as the session would expire.
>
>> If a monitoring frequency could be adjusted to be a
>> bit longer, then the monitoring case presumably wouldn't encounter this
>> issue even when using a fixed NameID.
> No, but you probably wouldn't want to monitor as infrequently as your
> session lifetime.
>
> -- Scott
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Haase
DAASI International GmbH                   phone:     +49 7071 407109-6
Europaplatz 3                              Fax  :     +49 7071 407109-9
D-72072 Tübingen                           email: Martin.Haase at DAASI.de
Germany                                    Web  :   http://www.daasi.de

Directory Applications for Advanced Security and Information Management
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2320 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Kryptografische Unterschrift
Url : http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20120329/da22d5ad/attachment.bin