Backchannel Notify and NameID bound sessions

[Kristof Bajnok]

On 05/03/12 14:26, Chad La Joie wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 08:22, Kristof Bajnok <bajnokk at niif.hu> wrote:
>> > Probably an RFE could help keeping track of this limitation, but I can
>> > agree with the Shib devs that your multiple IdP sessions + shared nameid
>> > + SLO scenario is quite special, and concerning the fundamental changes
>> > it seems to require, it will probably get low priority.
>
> It won't get any priority since it's not according to spec.

You have made me curious. What part is against the spec? (The reason for
asking is admin logout, where you probably can't avoid the multi-session
problem.)

Kristof