URL-encoded RelayState values

[Chad La Joie]

Yes, if it is using the POST binding to send the response.

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Andrew Webb <andrew.webb at statpro.com> wrote:
>
> lajoie wrote
>>
>> If the IdP is using the POST binding to send the response to the SP
>> than the relay state should be in the body and would be form encoded
>> not URL encoded.
>>
>
> Hmm.  Yes.  Good point.  So the IdP should take the RelayState value,
> URL-decode it, and then place the result in the body of the form such that
> it is form-encoded (i.e. application/x-www-form-urlencoded) ?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://shibboleth.1660669.n2.nabble.com/URL-encoded-RelayState-values-tp7580892p7580898.html
> Sent from the Shibboleth - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net



-- 
Chad La Joie
www.itumi.biz
trusted identities, delivered