SAML/SAMLP vs SAML2/SAMLP2 in assertions
Jeff McCullough
jeffmc at berkeley.edu
Sat Jan 28 00:07:30 GMT 2012
Quick question...
I've encountered a vendor, Catertrax, that will only accept SAML/SAMLP for version 1.1 and 2.0 assertions. The Shibboleth IdP sends SAML2/SAMLP2 for SAML 2.0 assertions. The vendor sent me a bunch of links proving their point, but I know you all worked on the spec. What gives? Is there a way in the Shib IdP to specify SAML vs SAML2 assertions for a relying-party?
Thanks,
Jeff
More information about the users
mailing list