X-Forwarded-For on the IdP
Turner, Andrew P
A.P.Turner at shu.ac.uk
Fri Feb 10 09:20:02 GMT 2012
Out of interest, why use the filter and not the Valve?
I have a one-liner in my sever.xml that seems to do what Elliot is asking for:
<Valve className="org.apache.catalina.valves.RemoteIpValve" internalProxies="regex representing IPs load balancer sends traffic on (SNAT pool)" />
Our IdP is behind F5 BIG-IPs. It certainly seems to put the X-Forwarded-For header value in the IdP logs, but then I'm new to Tomcat and Shib :)
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at shibboleth.net [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net] On Behalf Of James Bardin
Sent: 09 February 2012 20:28
To: Shib Users
Subject: Re: X-Forwarded-For on the IdP
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Elliot Kendall <elliot.kendall at emory.edu> wrote:
> We're certainly moving in that direction, but I expect it'll take a
> while to get the IdPs to that point. For now, I'm looking into using
> Tomcat's Remote IP Valve to get what I want.
You want to look at Tomcat's Remote IP Filter (not valve).
If you have apache in the mix, you can also use mod_rpaf.
-jim
--
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
More information about the users
mailing list