Shibboleth without attribute queries and artifact resolution

[Russell Beall]

Terracotta has "bit us" when they make an upgrade, but the existing software has been stable and functional.

Was there a pressing reason to upgrade, such as a security concern?

Regards,
Russ.

On Dec 14, 2012, at 12:05 PM, "Wessel, Keith William" <kwessel at illinois.edu> wrote:

> Thanks, both Kevin and Scott. And sorry about the wrong subject line out of the gate!
> 
> Terracotta has bit us enough times that we're now ready to have any excuse we can to get rid of it. Kevin, if in fact the TIMs are no longer needed, we look forward to hearing your findings as plan B. For now, though, think we'll look into enabling crypted transient IDs and turning off the artifact resolution.
> 
> Keith
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces at shibboleth.net [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net] On Behalf Of Cantor, Scott
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 2:00 PM
> To: Shib Users
> Subject: Re: Shibboleth without attribute queries and artifact resolution
> 
> On 12/14/12 2:53 PM, "Kevin P. Foote" <kpfoote at iup.edu> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Cantor, Scott wrote:
>> 
>> -> Are they supporting newer versions or literally not supporting Tomcat?
>> -> That seems extreme.
>> 
>> Don't want to hijack Keith's thread .. But before TC version 3.x.x (back
>> on the 2 series) we did not need a tim for tomcat.
>> 
>> I have yet to spin up my test rig and test this out but I think they
>> might have gone back to that model.
>> 
>> All we needed back then was the tim-vector to get the sessions (and
>> junk) stored in TC.
> 
> Thanks, Kevin. If anything is concluded, could something be added to our
> documentation? I don't feel qualified to really try to capture it since
> I've never touched the software.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net