Any Thoughts/Recommendations on Load Sharing and Failover?
cantor.2 at osu.edu
Wed Aug 22 15:43:56 EDT 2012
On 8/22/12 3:40 PM, "Tom Scavo" <trscavo at gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
>> The best option for artifact is to get the SAML 2 feature allowing
>> artifact endpoints supported. It's not supposed to be necessary to
>> artifact state.
>Oh, so Shibboleth doesn't support that? Which side?
I've never tested the SP, but it's not supposed to be something I need to
support explicitly, it should "just work".
The IdP may or may not support this, it's not really clear. The main
reason the IdP consumes its own metadata now is because of the requirement
to obtain the artifact endpoint index to stick in the artifact already.
It's possible that with some creative configuration it would work now.
More information about the users