Is it possible do different authentication based on different SP?

[Yaowen Tu]

Thank you so much Scott.

I just realized that my question is also related to another recently asked
question, whose title is:
              "Multiple Username/Password login handlers"
asked by Clay Cooper.

In that email, there is a concrete example.

Anyways, this requires a lot more configurations than option (2), I will
continue with option (2).

Thanks,
Yaowen


On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:

> On 8/16/12 7:58 PM, "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
> >
> >No. What I said was that you have to use different context classes to
> >indicate which handler you want. That doesn't mean using the same context
> >class, it means using different ones. You have to make up the two classes
> >to use.
>
> I think your confusion is that you think the only allowable context
> classes are the ones defined by the standard which are technology signals
> like "password". That isn't limited, you can define any context class you
> want by creating a URI for it and defining the meaning. The only thing
> connecting the built-in "password" class and the UsernamePassword handler
> in the IdP is you putting the string into the file. Pick your own URIs and
> you can do anything you want with them.
>
> -- Scott
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20120816/dff81234/attachment.html