Problem configuring and IdP to support anonymous relying parties

Chad La Joie lajoie at
Fri Sep 9 21:00:09 BST 2011

No, no reason to file them for v3.  I'm not just copying the schema's over.

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 15:57, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at> wrote:
> On 9/9/11 3:53 PM, "Chad La Joie" <lajoie at> wrote:
>>File a bug for anything you see like that.  I thought I had caught all
>>the cases where we used schema defaults.  Most at least have been
>>converted to use have the defaults in code.
> I'll go through them and file all the ones I can find, but I wouldn't
> suggest we bother with it except for v3. It's likely to risk introducing
> bugs to go messing with it at this point.
> Should I just file them against v3?
> -- Scott
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at

Chad La Joie
trusted identities, delivered

More information about the users mailing list