IdP change relaystate depending on attributes

[Cantor, Scott]

On 10/27/11 11:01 AM, "Chad La Joie" <lajoie at shibboleth.net> wrote:

>No, I don't think we have any features, documented or otherwise, that
>allows you to explicitly break SAML compliance.

I wouldn't go that far, we have all kinds of policy rule abstractions that
you can comment out. Even the binding templates could be hacked to send
the data using different parameter names, etc.

But there's a difference between can and should.

-- Scott