cacheable https requests

[Cantor, Scott]

On 10/25/11 4:32 AM, "Morris, Andi" <amorris at uwic.ac.uk> wrote:

>That's interesting to read, maybe it is possible then.  I was going on
>this from the EZProxy website:
>"Issues anticipated to be fixed in EZproxy 5.5 release later this year:
>
>EZproxy does not work Shibboleth IdP version 2.3 (on any of our supported
>Operating Systems). We understand what the issue is and are implementing
>a change to resolve this issue."

As a rule of thumb, if you see anything written about Shibboleth that
doesn't come from us or one of the federations, you can probably assume
it's inaccurate at best and flat wrong at worst.

Even if it didn't work with SAML 2.0, which isn't actually the case, it
would still work with SAML 1.1.

-- Scott