[Shib-Users] IdP/Tomcat possible memory leak

[Chad La Joie]

I mean that you claim to have a particular requirement (no downtime),
but what you're doing can't possibly accomplish that.  Thus, you're
doing something wrong.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 15:14, Roberto Ullfig <rullfig at uic.edu> wrote:
> Do you mean by "doing something wrong" that we're not doing IdP clustering
> with Terracotta?
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Chad La Joie <lajoie at shibboleth.net> wrote:
>>
>> There are a significant number of factors that can influence the start
>> up time of the container.  But at the end of the day it doesn't matter
>> whether your container is taking 5ms or 5min to startup, if you have to
>> worry about it you're doing something wrong.
>>
>> On 10/12/11 1:09 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
>> > On 10/12/11 12:50 PM, "Christopher Bongaarts" <cab at umn.edu> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Depends on the complexity of your attributes and/or the size of your
>> >> metadata.
>> >>
>> >> (For comparison, our test IdP takes a little over two minutes to start
>> >> up; production is about 80 seconds these days.)
>> >
>> > Mine takes about 10 seconds with 3-4 largish metadata files loaded
>> > including all of InCommon plus 300+ local SPs.
>> >
>> > I don't have a ton of attributes, but I do have upwards of a dozen JDBC
>> > and LDAP connectors.
>> >
>> > I do have fairly new hardware, with 8 cores per box.
>> >
>> > FWIW...
>> >
>> > -- Scott
>> >
>> > --
>> > To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
>> > users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
>> users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
>
>
>
> --
> Roberto Ullfig - rullfig at uic.edu
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
>



-- 
Chad La Joie
www.itumi.biz
trusted identities, delivered