Issues releasing Static Attributes with IdP 2.3.4

[Chad La Joie]

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 21:05, Dan McLaughlin
<dmclaughlin at tech-consortium.com> wrote:
>> It's possible, but I can tell you that my pre-release tests uses a> number of static data connectors and simple attribute definitions and> I didn't have any issues.
>
> So I get that the static data connectors and simple attribute
> definitions work in 2.3.4 if the ID's don't match (I haven't confirmed
> this myself yet, but we will in the coming days), but do your tests
> cover the case where the static data connectors and simple attribute
> definition ID's are the same?

No.

> Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that it makes since to have the
> ID's the same.  I'm just saying it worked when they were the same
> prior to 2.3.4, and now it seems to be broken.

I'm not saying it didn't work, but I certainly never intended for that
sort of cyclic dependency to do anything meaningful.  If I had
considered it, I would have made it simply throw an exception at start
up like the other cycles that are checked for.

-- 
Chad La Joie
www.itumi.biz
trusted identities, delivered