[Shib-Users] attribute definition for date of birth

Chad La Joie lajoie at shibboleth.net
Tue Dec 6 00:03:05 GMT 2011


Yep, looks like dashes are optional (didn't realize that).  I believe
then that means the LDAP general time syntax representing strictly a
date would be the same as the ISO8601 format without a time or optional
dashes.

On 12/5/11 6:57 PM, Michael Hodges wrote:
> See ISO 8601
> 
> The dashes are optional and I believe that the time portion can be
> dropped if not needed.
> 20111215T000000 and 20111215 would both be acceptable.  We've been
> working under
> this interpretation.
> 
>  - Michael
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Chad La Joie <lajoie at shibboleth.net
> <mailto:lajoie at shibboleth.net>> wrote:
> 
>     I'm pretty sure there isn't a different syntax; anything not present is
>     assumed to be zero.  So 2011-12-05 is technically
>     2011-12-05T00:00:00-0000
> 
>     On 12/5/11 6:27 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
>     > I don't know what the ISO syntax is for a date alone, I haven't
>     checked.
>     --
>     To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
>     users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
>     <mailto:users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net


More information about the users mailing list