[Shib-Users] attribute definition for date of birth
Chad La Joie
lajoie at shibboleth.net
Tue Dec 6 00:03:05 GMT 2011
Yep, looks like dashes are optional (didn't realize that). I believe
then that means the LDAP general time syntax representing strictly a
date would be the same as the ISO8601 format without a time or optional
dashes.
On 12/5/11 6:57 PM, Michael Hodges wrote:
> See ISO 8601
>
> The dashes are optional and I believe that the time portion can be
> dropped if not needed.
> 20111215T000000 and 20111215 would both be acceptable. We've been
> working under
> this interpretation.
>
> - Michael
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Chad La Joie <lajoie at shibboleth.net
> <mailto:lajoie at shibboleth.net>> wrote:
>
> I'm pretty sure there isn't a different syntax; anything not present is
> assumed to be zero. So 2011-12-05 is technically
> 2011-12-05T00:00:00-0000
>
> On 12/5/11 6:27 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
> > I don't know what the ISO syntax is for a date alone, I haven't
> checked.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
> <mailto:users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
More information about the users
mailing list