Multi-valued attributes - some values not encoded by IdP?

Phil Chapman phil at atomwide.com
Sat Aug 13 09:22:12 BST 2011


Thanks Scott.  I'd missed the announcement of v2.3.3 as I hadn't updated my mail filter rules for the new @shibboleth.net addresses.  Apologies for wasting everyone's time.

Is a v2.3.4 imminent to resolve the "additional duplication issues"?

Phil.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces at shibboleth.net [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net]
> On Behalf Of Cantor, Scott E.
> Sent: 12 August 2011 23:27
> To: users at shibboleth.net
> Subject: Re: Multi-valued attributes - some values not encoded by IdP?
> 
> On 8/12/11 6:22 PM, "Phil Chapman" <phil at atomwide.com> wrote:
> >
> >Just a thought: is it possible that values 2 and 3 are eliminated
> >because the bit before the scope is the same for all three values?
> 
> Yes, that's the bug that was fixed in 2.3.3, at the cost of causing some
> additional duplication issues.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-
> unsubscribe at shibboleth.net


More information about the users mailing list