<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/3/18 11:24 AM, Tom Scavo wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAEtu=dMGt5pxnPMgOrhFyQENsmdb-=7_JdRsHBQX5wV1Kq=+NQ@mail.gmail.com">
<pre wrap="">Thanks Rod. Comments and questions below.
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Rod Widdowson <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:rdw@steadingsoftware.com"><rdw@steadingsoftware.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
>From the schema:
supportedContentTypes,
maxConnectionsTotal,
maxConnectionsTotal
are *NOT* available (directly) on the batch loaders.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
That seems like a bug. Should I file an issue in jira?</pre>
</blockquote>
No. The maxConnections* ones are not relevant to t he batch HTTP
providers, since they only ever execute 1 HTTP connection at a time,
to the domain they are configured with. The dynamic provider can
have many simultaneous connections, to many different mains
(routes).<br>
<br>
The supportedContentTypes option is simply not supported by the
(older) batch resolvers.<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hmm, the wiki docs do not agree with the above list so let me ask: Are
basicAuthUser and basicAuthPassword mutually exclusive of
httpClientRef? Are httpClientRef and httpClientSecurityParametersRef
mutually exclusive of each other?</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Off-hand I don't remember for sure. I'd have to look. I didn't
think they were.<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAEtu=dMGt5pxnPMgOrhFyQENsmdb-=7_JdRsHBQX5wV1Kq=+NQ@mail.gmail.com">
<pre wrap="">
Here is the Million Dollar Question: What is the default value of the
httpCaching attribute on a FileBackedHTTPMetadataProvider? (Please
don’t say “none!”)</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
It is 'none', if one is using the default internally-constructed
HttpClient. Because of the 1) memory requirements of in-memory and
2) disk requirements of disk, we didn't want to make assumptions
about either of those defaults being ok. <br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAEtu=dMGt5pxnPMgOrhFyQENsmdb-=7_JdRsHBQX5wV1Kq=+NQ@mail.gmail.com"></blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>