<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/18/16 9:40 AM, Cantor, Scott
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:9846A6064BD102419D06814DD0D78DE112A58018@CIO-TNC-D2MBX02.osuad.osu.edu"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">While seeing changes related to HttpClient go by, I'm curious if/when we
upgrade to 4.5.x. (JSPT-60)
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
It's been on my mind, but it's not as simple as some other deps
where we just change the version in the POM, and if all the tests
still pass, we're good. My impression was that there are some
potentially "disturbing" technical changes going on in there...<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:9846A6064BD102419D06814DD0D78DE112A58018@CIO-TNC-D2MBX02.osuad.osu.edu"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
(FWIW I don't have any particular reason to want to upgrade nor have I
reviewed their changelog, but I do know I've had to use the newer version of
HttpClient along with newer versions of Selenium.)
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Would need to see the chanelog at a minimum, but this late it would take a lot of testing also.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
It would certainly need a lot of testing, but it may also need code
changes too, or at least detailed review of our code. We have some
fairly complex custom things for HC, and we'd need to make sure that
all that was correct, or needed some changes, additions, etc ported
over. IIRC I'm also pretty sure they deprecated a bunch of stuff
that we would need to change on our side. <br>
<br>
At this point, I'd propose we do it for a 3.4.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>