Codeberg experiment invitation

[Ian Young]

> On 26 Sep 2025, at 17:45, Wessel, Keith via dev <dev at shibboleth.net> wrote:
> 
> Codeberg has some room for improvement. I'd give it a solid B+ for accessibility. That's up from the C+ I'd give the Git web interface.

It’s good to know that we’re at least not going backwards.

> But I'm going to say we're good enough here, and given the opportunity, I'd be happy to make suggestions to Codeberg to make it even better.

I think the place to go for that would be this issue tracker:

https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues?state=open

It looks like accessibility issues are labelled with "forgejo/accessibility”.

https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues?labels=81214

I’m sure they don’t have anyone working full-time on this, but they do seem to be open for improvement suggestions.

    -- Ian




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4151 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/dev/attachments/20250929/834ef769/attachment.p7s>