GEANT OIDC plugin
Cantor, Scott
cantor.2 at osu.edu
Mon Sep 10 10:28:03 EDT 2018
On 9/10/18, 10:08 AM, "dev on behalf of Janne Lauros" <dev-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of janne.lauros at csc.fi> wrote:
> There is no argument here on neither point. If it is seen better to move the sub to "normal" claim, we will do it. I have
> not actually even considered that all before.
I'll have a default for this in 3.4 for the new pairwise attribute so it should be a simple matter of attaching an encoder to it. I know OIDC sub claims aren't explicitly scoped but I don't think there's any rule saying they can't be.
-- Scott
More information about the dev
mailing list