subject-id and pairwise-id internal ids

[Cantor, Scott]

On 6/27/18, 9:56 AM, "dev on behalf of Peter Schober" <dev-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of peter.schober at univie.ac.at> wrote:

> So any idea or preference how you'd call these in the config?

As Rod said, I really haven't dug into it yet to add them, but we probably would follow pre-existing IdP patterns unless people think we should just copy the SP's conventions as a "fresh start" or something.

> So following these two examples I'm assuming
> "subjectId" and "pairwiseId" would be the most likely internal
> attribute id for those two new standard attributes?

From memory that would probably fit the IdP conventions, yes. If that sounds ok, I'd just suggest proposing them in the JIRA issue and then we can make sure to copy those in.

-- Scott